Nutrien reviews

3.6

69% would recommend to a friend

(917 total reviews)

Ken Seitz

74% approve of CEO

54% positive business outlook

Nutrien has an employee rating of 3.6 out of 5 stars, based on 917 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Nutrien employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Agriculture industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

917 reviews
1.0
Jun 20, 2018
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Pay & Benefits - But that may change in 2019 when merger is completed and all employees are are on one payment and benefits plan. However the pay and benefits are not worth it if you are the type of person who wants to feel like you are making a difference as that is not how it works in this company.

Cons

Lack of organization & structure - No company goals have been issued and half way through the year. But it has been like that for the last two years prior to the merger. Poor senior leadership that do not empower or support their workers but micro manage and if something goes wrong be prepared to take the brunt of it as the leaders who were giving you "direction" will either fade into the wood work or deny any involvement. Merger is not going well as it will take at least another 2 years until the company will be somewhat productive. Employees were told that the cultures between the two companies were very much the same; but that could not be further from the truth. There is a currently a power struggle between legacy Agrium and legacy PCS senior leadership so progress is slow which has impacted forward progress as the workforce is currently in a holding pattern. If you love change then you will love this company. Tonnes of changes prior to the merger and when the merger was made official on January 1, 2018 a structure and executive leadership team was announced. Well since then (5 months into the merger) 2 executive leaders "left" the company and they have changed business units structure from 3 down to 2. Well planned as that impacts a lot of people in middle management roles. Your supervisor will probably be in another province, state or even country. Not sure why they would not move department into one similar location so they can work together as right now some departments are spread out all over North America. Not a good situation for growth and input from your supervisor. This has lead to isolation for certain departments as legacy PCS employees are in their one location doing work the legacy PCS way and the same for legacy Agrium. How can a department function that way when one department are doing thing differently?

1.0
Dec 16, 2018

Toxic Environment

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good front-line employees, but leaders set-up employee to fail. A very cost-focused environment where leaders do not walk the talk. Too many good and talented people are gone due to the merger with only yes people left.

Cons

Political environment rules where leaders lack doing the "right things" and play games. Employees are not valued only looked at as an expense. As long as you keep your mouth closed, do not talk with others, and agree with leaders you may be safe.

1.0
Dec 5, 2018

IT has serious issues.

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

-There are some incredibly talented and dedicated folks who are a joy to work with. These people keep the lights on and fix things when the contractors don't know what to do. -Pay and benefits in Saskatoon couldn't be beat (especially at the management and director level), however in recent years other tech companies have been nipping at their heals for roles lower down. The "golden handcuffs" are silver or bronze at best. -I gained a lot of valuable experience at PotashCorp and got to see and do some cool things.

Cons

-Staff have been assured for years that the increasing number of contractors was to ensure that if layoffs came, the contractors would be the first to go. When the merger happened, dozens of IT staff were forced to train their own replacements who were contractors. As far as I know, no contractors were let go. Most of the functions performed by these staff will continue to exist for many years and have no end of life planned; the move was purely to reduce headcount to rather than to save money. -Massive outsourcing to Tata Consulting Services (TCS) has disillusioned many key staff. The quality of the work is extremely poor and the quality of service provided by IT has diminished significantly since these changes. Instead of building and providing great services, IT staff spend their time trying to herd contractors towards solutions. -Contractors are the solution to every problem in managements eyes; full time positions aren't even considered for long term initiatives that will last years. These contractors often cost significantly more than a local hire would cost (the rate can be as high as $150 to $300 per hour for many of these contractors doing simple things like data services ETL work or O365/Azure administration). -There is no plan in place to deal with departures of key staff in critical positions. In the past staff would move up through the ranks, gaining technical skill and domain knowledge along the way. Since these lower level functions are all being outsourced, there is no pool of candidates within the organization anymore to replace people after they've left or fill new positions. -Saskatoon office has basically been gutted. I'd be surprised if an IT department exists there other than the few key people who still work there.

Viewing 1 - 3 of 917 Reviews

Glassdoor has 1,656 Nutrien reviews submitted anonymously by Nutrien employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Nutrien is right for you.