employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Statistics Canada

Is this your company?

Statistics Canada reviews

4.0

67% would recommend to a friend

(508 total reviews)

André Loranger

69% approve of CEO

22% positive business outlook

Statistics Canada has an employee rating of 4.0 out of 5 stars, based on 508 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Statistics Canada employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Government and public administration industry (3.6 stars).

Reviews by job title

508 reviews
2.0
Apr 8, 2018
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Starting pay for recruits is really competitive....but plateaus fairly quickly. Pension, Stability, not much else really.... Pay after several years experience is much better in private sector if you are in a in-demand field....

Cons

In the EC stream, most of the EC jobs are essentially boring data verification/ Excel spreadsheet monkey copy and paste jobs that have little to no career potential for advancement outside of Statcan, Most EC positions in federal government outside StatCan require experience in economic research, policy analysis, writing papers, and doing economic/statistical modeling with some programming knowledge involved. The knowledge that you gain in MOST (but not all) EC positions at StatCan are fairly useless. There are some EC positions in the analytical studies branch where you get experience doing research and analysis but these are rare, max 100 ppl in these divisions versus 2000+ in the survey processing, national accounts and prices divisions. There are some good roles in these divisions too, but probably less than 20%. Found myself unable to apply or even be considered for other EC positions outside StatCan even for a secondment as the experience and skills developed there were too basic. Why I took the job was because it was initially advertised as an Analyst/Economist position....but I guess I should've checked more carefully before accepting the offer. Only looked at job title and pay alone, and that was enough to entice me, thinking that things would get better, but in the end, left after 3.5 years. Luckily, I had skills and prior experience in coding/programming and was able to secure a role in this area outside government. HR manager on my 2nd day even advised me on my 2nd day that if I did not like what I was doing after 2 years as a recruit, then I should quit....should've taken that advice sooner. Most recruits I know that joined StatCan that had other skills and experiences eventually quit within 2-3 years to take on jobs that were more fulfilling, higher pay and better career development. If you have any career ambitions or goals, then I would AVOID the EC stream at StatCan! I am not too familiar with the CS and MA streams, but I have heard that the training opportunities and career development are better there....some ppl from those streams have gone on to work at Google, Adobe etc. in Silicon Valley. Oh and I would not recommend the FI accounting stream either.....also kind of dead-end in sense that it would be very hard transition to industry or public accounting (ex. KPMG, E & Y etc.).

1.0
Apr 20, 2018

Dead end jobs w bosses stuck in 50s mindset

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Pay (for my low level job) & Benefits & Pension

Cons

If your manager doesn't like you for any reason, you are screwed to never get promoted.

3.0
Apr 10, 2016
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great work-life balance Good salary for the work that you do Stable and secure

Cons

While there are certainly many pros to working at StatCan, it all depends on WHICH stream you are in. IF you are in I.T., methodology or accounting, then this is a great place to not only build your career, but to also develop skills relevant to your profession. IF you are however an EC, then you will most likely have very little opportunity to develop a marketable and transferable skill set. As a so-called "Analyst-Economist", you will gain experience mainly in the verification of economic data, which is really just manual spot checks and making sure its consistent with the previous year and with a variety of data sources (in other words, grunt work). Most of the work is monotonous, repetitive and can easily be automated. This is true of most of the EC work at StatCan, though your experience may vary depending on which team/projects you get into. You generally, will not have experience doing economic analysis, modeling, simulation, econometrics or any truly analytical work. That's left for the analysts and economist who work outside of StatCan, your only job is to compile the data, not analyze it. And as another poster said, the programming is left up to the I.T. people and the quantitative analysis to the methodology people, which means the only thing you are responsible for is basic data administration and compilation. As a result, most of the ECs have very few skills to transfer out of there, and end up being unhappy and depressed at what they do. In fact, the only ECs that I have met that enjoy what they do are those who are remote sensing and GIS experts, and that's because they actually work as specialized "professionals".

Viewing 1 - 3 of 508 Reviews

Glassdoor has 949 Statistics Canada reviews submitted anonymously by Statistics Canada employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Statistics Canada is right for you.